<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Noel Semple</title>
	<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>3.2.3	Application to provincial/territorial law</title>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Advisory Guidelines have specifically been developed under the federal Divorce Actand are intended for use under that legislation. Provincial/territorial support law is governed by distinct statutory regimes. However, in practice there is much overlap between federal and provincial/territorial support laws.
The broad conceptual framework for spousal support articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moge and Bracklow [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca/?p=160</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Federal v. Provincial law</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Are the parties either (i) already divorced, or (ii) seeking a divorce?
Yes:
No:
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca/?p=158</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Canadian Law and Society Association Annual Meeting: Final Program</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Concordia University
Montreal, Quebec
June 2-4, 2010
CLSAFinalSchedule
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca/?p=123</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Osgoode Hall Graduate Law Students’ Association Conference: May 20th and 21st, 2010</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Osgoode Professional Development Centre, 1 Dundas West, 26th floor.  Toronto, Ontario.
BEYOND LAW: AT THE EDGES OF LAW’S AMBIT
Thursday, May 20th
8:15-9:00 AM: REGISTRATION AND BREAKFAST (Room E)
9:00-9:15 AM: CONFERENCE WELCOME (Room C)



9:00: GLSA President Stu Marvel &#8211; Welcome       Message
9:05: Welcome Message from Incoming Dean       [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca/?p=110</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Whose Best Interests?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 48, No. 2 (Forthcoming, late summer 2010)
This article compares the law of custody and access disputes with the procedure used to resolve them. I argue that there is a fundamental contradiction between these two things. The former focuses on the interests of the children involved to the exclusion of all [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca/?p=105</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Silent Child</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1, page 1. (March, 2010)
There are two possible forms of evidence in a custody or access (visitation) case which is determined through adjudication.  First, the judge may hear from the adult parties and the witnesses whom they choose to call.  Second, the judge may hear &#8220;children&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca/?p=48</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Eye of the Beholder:  Professional Opinions about the Best Interests of a Child</title>
		<description><![CDATA[This is my LL.M thesis, which I successfully defended on June 10, 2009.  Below, please find short and long versions of the thesis, as well as a 15 minute video presentation.

The Eye of the Beholder from Noel Semple on Vimeo.
Thesis version (30,000 words)
Short Version (8500 words)
For an even shorter description, please click here:
When parents separate [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca/?p=47</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>In Sickness and in Health?   Spousal Support and Unmarried Cohabitants.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian Journal of Family Law, Vol. 24, Issue 2, page 317.
When an intimate relationship breaks down and one of the people involved seeks money from the other, should it make any difference to the law whether or not they were formally married?  This article argues that it should make a difference, at least when [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca/?p=28</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Judicial Review in the Federal Courts: A How-To Guide.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[with Freya Kristjanson, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.
Prepared for the Ontario Legal Clinics Conference, this is a summary of the procedure and substance of Federal Court judicial review of administrative decisions. This paper was written with a legal clinic audience in mind, and pays particular attention to the federally-reviewed tribunals which clinic workers are most likely [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca/?p=26</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Network Neutrality:  Justifiable Discrimination, Unjustifiable Discrimination, and the Bright Line Between Them</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian Journal of Law and Technology. Volume 6, Issue 3, p. 163.
The servers and data streams which make up the internet in Canada are owned and controlled by corporations like Rogers and Bell.  These businesses have potentially enormous power to control how the internet works, and how much it costs you to use it. [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.noelsemple.ca/?p=15</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
