Traffic Studies on Dundas

Dear Councillor Grimes and Councillor Holyday,

Thank you very much for your support of traffic studies for the Dundas Street West intersections with (1) Wimbleton/Old Oak , and (2) Earlington Ave or Old Dundas.   I have shared this good news with the members of the Better Dundas Coalition.  We really appreciate your help in bringing these matters before Council.

On behalf of the Coalition, I am writing to seek some further information about the study process for these two intersections.  I understand that the studies will produce recommendations regarding the suitability of these intersections for traffic lights. 

— Will the traffic studies take into account the interests of pedestrians seeking to cross Dundas Street West, for example through the inclusion of pedestrian movement studies?  Many local residents are concerned about the shortage of safe crossing places on Dundas.  Between the traffic lights at Chestnut Hills Crescent and the Kingsway Mills Shopping Centre, there is a 1.3 kilometre stretch with no traffic lights or crosswalks.  There is also a 650 metre stretch without safe crossing places between Prince Edward Drive and Howland Avenue.    Traffic lights at the intersections named above would cut these distances without safe crossing places roughly in half. 

— Will the traffic studies take into account expected future vehicle traffic, or just current vehicle traffic?   There are multiple applications to construct large residential buildings on the south side of Dundas between Prince Edward and the Humber River.  Further residential intensification seems likely on the north side of this stretch as well.  When these buildings are constructed, they will significantly increase traffic in the area, increasing the need for a traffic light at Earlington.  (If future demand absolutely cannot be considered as part of the traffic study process, it might be better to conduct the study after the new buildings are complete).

— Regarding the interests of pedestrians and cyclists, will the traffic studies take into account the interests of the many people who currently avoid Dundas Street West, but would walk or bike on it if if the City makes it more safe and pleasant to do so?   Or will the studies just count the small number of (very brave) people willing to walk or cycle on Dundas today?

— Will the traffic studies take into account the City’s policies regarding Vision ZeroComplete Streets, and Walking to School?  We believe that installing traffic lights in these locations would be aligned with all of these goals.

— Will the traffic studies include an opportunity for community input? 

— Will the studies evaluate the intersections over multiple days, so as to include (for example) individuals at Wimbleton/Old Oak going to the school and church at the busiest times for those institutions?

— Rebecca Guida kindly provided the service request # for the Old Oak/Wimbleton traffic study request. Your email below indicated that such a request will also be made regarding Earlington/Old Dundas. Could you please provide the service request # for that?

Again, thank you very much for your support. We do hope that the Traffic Study process will take into account the interests of everyone affected by the decisions which the City will make. 

Best wishes,

Noel Semple

A Discussion with Yasir Naqvi

hosted by Noel Semple. October 28, 2020 at 7pm.

Yasir Naqvi is Chief Executive Officer of the Institute for Canadian Citizenship.

Pro-democracy advocates, Yasir’s family emigrated from Pakistan to Canada in 1988. Inspired by his parents, Yasir served as a member of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, representing a diverse community in Ottawa between 2007 and 2018. In 2016, he was sworn in as the Attorney General of Ontario. Educated at McMaster University, University of Ottawa Faculty of Law, and Carleton University, Yasir was called to the Bar in Ontario in 2001 and went on to practise international trade and administrative law with major law firms.

Yasir has marked our idea of citizenship in multiple ways. While Attorney General of Ontario, he implemented the All Families Are Equal Act to ensure that all children are treated equally, regardless of how they are conceived, and recognize the legal status of all parents. He also championed new laws to prevent sexual violence and help survivors, increase respect for the rights and cultures of Indigenous peoples, expand access to restorative justice, and promote multiculturalism.

Wednesday, October 28 2020, 7pm.

Click here to join online:

To join by phone: dial 647 374 4685 (Toronto local)

Find your local number:

Meeting ID: 950 405 1646

Passcode: 770001

Dr. Dianne Saxe: Climate changes Everything

hosted by Noel Semple

Monday October 19, 7pm, via Zoom

Dr. Dianne Saxe is one of Canada’s leading environmental lawyers. In 2015 she was appointed Environmental Commissioner of Ontario by Premier Kathleen Wynne. She served in that position until 2019.

Dr. Saxe has been a leading voice calling attention to the climate emergency, and identifying constructive policy options for responding to it.

Please join us for this online conversation hosted by Noel Semple of the Etobicoke-Lakeshore Provincial Liberal Association.

Topics will include carbon pricing, climate-related litigation, and how to discuss climate change with voters.

Monday, October 19 2020, 7pm.

Click here to join online:

To join by phone: dial 647 374 4685 (Toronto local)

Find your local number:

Meeting ID: 950 405 1646

Passcode: 770001

Long Live the Law Practice Program

I am struggling to understand the justification for the recent committee recommendation to end the Law Practice Program. The LPP is the Law Society’s alternative licensing program predominantly used by candidates unable to find articling positions.

The committee‘s central rationale seems to be that the LPP is “perceived as second tier.” They acknowledge that (i) “there is no evidence to suggest that the LPP is in fact second-tier” and (ii) the LPP is “of very high quality and may, in fact, excel over articling in a number of areas” in terms of preparing candidates for practice (para 59).

A regulator ending the LPP because it’s perceived as second tier to articling is like a regulator banning Chevrolets because they are perceived as second tier to Cadillacs. A regulator which does so must, at very least, have a realistic plan to ensure that everyone will be able to drive a Cadillac/get an articling position.  I can’t find any such plan in this Report. Continue reading

Three Routes to Justice for All

Lawyers Weekly, October 30, 2015.

Full text:

The LSUC needs to expand the scope of paralegals, online information and ABS.

A statutory mandate was given to the Law Society of Upper Canada almost ten years ago: “Act so as to facilitate access to justice for the people of Ontario.” How effectively has it been carried out?

Undeniably, access to justice is now taken seriously at Osgoode Hall. Recent initiatives such as the treasurer’s action group on access to justice are encouraging to those who want all Ontarians to enjoy the law’s benefits.

While great strides have been made, a great distance remains to be travelled. Three policy areas — paralegal practice, online information, and alternative business structures — illustrate both how far the law society has come and how far it must still go.
Continue reading

Osgoode Hall Graduate Law Students’ Association Conference: May 20th and 21st, 2010

Osgoode Professional Development Centre, 1 Dundas West, 26th floor.  Toronto, Ontario.


Thursday, May 20th



    • 9:00: GLSA President Stu Marvel – Welcome Message
    • 9:05: Welcome Message from Incoming Dean Lorne Sossin

9:15 – 10:35 AM: KEYNOTE ADDRESS (Room C)


10:35 – 10:50: COFFEE BREAK (Room E)

10:50 -12:00pm:  PANELS I & II

PANEL I: Tracking Financial Actors From Civil Society to the Marketplace (Room C)

DISCUSSANT: ANITA ANAND (University of Toronto Law) CHAIR: Charis Kamphuis

  • Virginia Torrie (LLM Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), Accounting Knowledge for Securities Law Scholarship
  • Vanisha H. Sukdeo (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), Corporate Social Responsibility and the Intersection of Workers’ Rights
  • Lori McMillan (Associate Professor of Law, Washburn University School of Law), Public Benefit Theory and Noncharitable Nonprofit Organizations in Canada

Sponsored by the Graduate Program in Law at Osgoode Hall Law School

PANEL II: Human Rights in Question: ‘Metanarratives of (Dis) Ability’ (Room D)


CHAIR: Ruby Dhand

  • Megan Evans Maxwell (SJD Candidate, University of Toronto), Substantive Socioeconomic Rights: The Missing Link in the Evolution of Canadian Human Rights Jurisprudence
  • Susan Barak (PhD Candidate, York University), Of Tort and Trauma: the Vital Nature of Legal Remedies to Address and Redress
  • Bonita Heath (PhD Candidate, York University), Benefits versus Rights: A False Dichotomy in the Political Economy of Disability?

Sponsored by the York Centre for Public Policy and Law

12:00 -1:00 PM: LUNCH (Room E)

NOON SEMINAR – Edward Elgar Publishing, Law Acquisitions Editor Tara Gorvine (Room B)

1:00 – 2:50 PM: PANELS III & IV

PANEL III: Sustaining Resources, People & the Environment (Room C)

DISCUSSANT: TBC (Osgoode)                                          CHAIR: Patricia Hania

  • Karen Fernandes (LLM Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), Regulation, Sustainability and Planning Controls: Assessing the Global Development of Inclusive Communities
  • Sarah Hamill (PhD Candidate, University of Alberta), Creation and Control: the Battle to Control Liquor and Natural Resources in Alberta, 1905 – c.1940
  • Priscila B. Becker (LLM Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), The Convention on Biological Diversity, Indigenous Peoples and Conservation of Biodiversity
  • Tiffany MacLellan (MA Candidate, Ottawa University), Protecting Gaps or Addressing them: The Nexus between Climate Change and Forced Migration
  • Mostafa Mahmud Naser (PhD Candidate, Macquarie University), Climate Change and Forced Migration: In Search of Recognition in International Law

Sponsored by the Institute for Research and Innovation in Sustainability

PANEL IV: Rethinking Law’s Method
(Room D)


  • Anastasia Tataryn (PhD Candidate, University of Ottawa), Excavations, Revolutions and Legal Research Methodologies: Bring the Inside-Out or the Out-Inside
  • Amaya Alvez (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School) Proportionality Analysis at the intersection of Comparative Law and Socio-Legal Studies
  • Erika Arban (PhD Candidate, University of Ottawa), Suggesting methodological approaches to the study of Comparative Constitutional Law
  • F.E. Guerra-Pujol (Associate Professor Barry University Dwayne O. School of Law), Mathematics and the Law: A Misunderstood Relation
  • Keith Crawford (PhD Candidate, University of Nottingham School of Law) Power, Replication and Certainty:  Problems with the use of Econometrics in Law

Sponsored by the Graduate Program in Law at Osgoode Hall Law School

2:50 – 4:00 PM: PANELS V & VI

PANEL VTracking Copyrights Across the Globe (Room C)


CHAIR: Vanisha H. Sukdeo

  • Khadijeh Hamidian Shour Masty (PhD Candidate, University of Leeds), The Position of Copyright in Shia Islamic Jurisprudence and its Effect on the Future of Copyright Law in Jurisdiction Under its Influence
  • Dilan Thampapillai (PhD Candidate, Melbourne University), Copyright Reform for an Innovation Economy: an Australian Example in Time of Free Trade Agreements?
  • Jie Hua (PhD Candidate, University of Hong Kong), A Comparative Perspective: Copyright Protection Mechanism on Folklore in China

Sponsored by the York Centre for Public Policy and Law

PANEL VI: Legal Immanence: Religion, Mythology and the Influence of the Divine (Room D)


  • Nicholas A. Bastine (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), Trokosi: An Investigation into Oppression of Ghanaian Women and the Relevance of National and International Laws for the Protection of Women and Children in Ghana
  • Farah Deeba Chowdhury (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), The Islamic Law of Dower and Maintenance: Case Studies of Iran, Tunisia and Bangladesh
  • Sirus Kashefi (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), God, Myth, and the State

Sponsored by the Graduate Program in Law at Osgoode Hall Law School

4:00 – 4:15 PM: COFFEE BREAK (Room E)

4:25 – 5:55 PM: PANELS VII & VIII

PANEL VII: Knowledges Across Time: Traditional and Contemporary Frameworks (Room D)


  • Ana Eduarda Santos (SJD Candidate, Duke University), Opening Up Intellectual Property in the Information Age
  • Mizanur Rahaman (PhD Candidate, Kent Law School), Agrobiotechnology, Global Intellectual Property Laws and Biopolitics;
  • Chris Plecash (MA  Candidate, York University), Intellectual Property and the Endangerment of traditional Knowledge – the Case for Tribal Rights
  • Daniel R. Ruhweza (PhD Candidate, Kent Law School), Old Wine in New Jars: Re-Thinking the Place of Indigenous Justice Mechanisms in International Criminal Law

Sponsored by the Canada Research Chair in Feminist Political Economy

PANEL VIII: Law, Youth and the Child: Exploring Vulnerabilities (Room C)

CHAIR: Mazen Mazri

  • Dayna Crosby (MA Candidate, York University), The Politics of ‘Community’ and the Scarborough Youth Justice Committee: A Conversation of Governance, Risk and the production of the “Good ‘Canadian’ Citizen”
  • Thoko Kaime (Lecturer in Law, School of Law, University of Surrey), Socio-legal Approach to Researching Children’s Rights Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Discussion of Methodology
  • Noel Semple (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), Whose Best Interest?
  • Jen Rinaldi (Critical Disability Studies, York University), Wrongful Life and Wrongful Birth: The Devaluation of Life with Disability

Sponsored by the Institute for Feminist Legal Studies



The Road Forward  – a staged reading

By Yvette Nolan

With Craig Lauzon, Michaela Washburn and Falen Johnson

(To be followed by Q&A)

7:20 – 9:00 PM: VINO DE HONOR RECEPTION (Room E)

Please be invited to join us for a glass of wine after the performance.

Osgoode Hall Graduate Law Students’ Association Conference
May 20th and 21st, 2010

Friday, MAY 21st

9:30-10:00 AM: BREAKFAST (Room E)

10:o0- 11:10 AM: PANELS IX & X

PANEL IX: Multiple Orderings: Legal Pluralism (Room D)

DISCUSSANT: KATE SUTHERLAND (Osgoode)                                              CHAIR: Amaya Alvez

  • Patricia Pinto Soares (European University Institute Researcher), The Merits and Limits of the Sociological Discourse in International Criminal Law: Framing the Role of Human Rights Law in International Criminal Judgments
  • Amy Jackson (PhD Candidate, University of Reading), A Critical Legal Pluralist Analysis of the Begum case
  • Sujith Xavier (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), Queering TWAIL

Sponsored by the Nathanson Centre on Transnational Human Rights, Crime and Security

PANEL X: Constructing Socio-Legal Identities (Room C)

DISCUSSANT: SONIA LAWRENCE (Osgoode)                                               CHAIR: Cailin Morrison

  • Stella Szantova Giordano (Quinnipiac University School of Law), Illegal Aliens and the American Legal System: Why Undocumented Immigrants Bring Lawsuits in the United States
  • Graciela Flores Mendez (MA Candidate, York University), Alien/ation: Race, Citizenship, and the Construction of the Mexican ‘Illegal Alien’
  • Kaushalya Bannerji (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), This Black Man is Lost! No One Knows Where He Is From: Discourses of the ‘Othering’ in Cuba 1886-1912

Sponsored by the Graduate Program in Socio-Legal Studies at York University

11:10 – 11:25 AM: COFFEE BREAK (Room E)

11:25 – 12:35 PM: PANELS XI & XII

PANEL XI: Bodies Beyond Borders
(Room C)

DISCUSSANT: MARY CONDON (Osgoode)                                             CHAIR: Mary Stokes

  • Stu Marvel (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School); Reprogenetics, Bioethics and the Law: Tracking the Impact of International Commercial Surrogacy
  • Sarah L. Steele (Lecturer in Law, University of Oxford) The forgotten gender(s): Men, Criminal Law and the United States Government’s Approach to Trafficking in Persons
  • Igor Gontcharov (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School)- From Human Subjects to Human Participants

Sponsored by the Graduate Program in Sexuality Studies at York University

PANEL XII: Grappling Health Law’s Controversies (Room D)

DISCUSSANT: KIMBERLEY WHITE (York)                                                    CHAIR: Karen Fernandes

  • Lucy Costa (PhD Candidate, York University), Law, Madness and the making of Patient’s Rights
  • Ruby Dhand (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), Auditing Mental Health Legislation: International Perspectives
  • Christina J. Hollingshead (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), Little Girl Lost: Lessons Learned From the Ashley Smith Tragedy for (Re)Addressing Canada’s Custodial Obligation

Sponsored by the York Institute for Health Research

12:35 – 1:20 PM: LUNCH (Room E)

1:20 – 2:30 PM: KEYNOTE ADDRESS (Room C)

PROFESSOR FRANCISCO VALDES (Miami School of Law) – After Law

2:30 – 2:45 PM: COFFEE BREAK (Room E)

2:45 – 4:15 PM: PANELS XIII & XIV

PANEL XIII: Remembering and Resisting (Room D)

DISCUSSANT: KAREN KNOPP               (University of Toronto) CHAIR: Sujith Xavier

  • Amar T. Khoday (PhD Candidate, McGill University Faculty of Law), Protecting Those Who Go Beyond the Law: Granting Asylum to Individuals Who Challenge Oppression Through Resistance
  • Stacy Douglas (PhD Candidate, Kent Law School), Between Mo(nu)ments: Memorialising Past, Present and Future in South Africa
  • Vijaya Sripati (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), UN Constitutional Assistance [UNCA]: An International Law & Policy implementing mechanism or another tool of imperialism?
  • Naiara Arriola – (PhD Candidate, Deusto Faculty of Law), The Challenges for Constitutional Law Within the Transnationalization of the European Legal Framework

Sponsored by the Centre for Refugee Studies

PANEL XIV: Competing Orders or Competing Disorders (Room C)

DISCUSSANT: ROBERT LATHAM (York)                                                  CHAIR: Amar Bhatia

  • Saiful Karim (PhD Candidate, Macquarie University), Litigation as a Strategy for Settlement of Maritime Security Disputes: The ‘Volga Case’ Revisited
  • Saeid Mirzaei-Yengejeh (PhD Candidate, University of Ottawa), Implementation of Normative Resolutions of the Security Council in the Areas of Counter-terrorism and Non-Proliferation of Weapons of Mass-destruction
  • Ayodele Akenroye (LLM. Candidate, University of Manitoba), HIV/AIDS, Military and the Future of Peacekeeping in Africa
  • Demola Okeowo (LL.M. Candidate, Queen’s University) Resolution 1267 Committee in the War on Terror: A Ticking Time Bomb on Human Rights

Sponsored by the York Centre for International and Security Studies

4:15 – 4:30 COFFEE BREAK (Room E)

4:30 – 6:00 PM: PANELS XV & XVI

PANEL XV: Pushing the Limits of Rights (Room C)

DISCUSSANT: ANNIE BUNTING (Osgoode)                                           CHAIR: Igor Gontcharov

  • Opeoluwa Badaru (PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School), Exploring the Limits of Human Rights Law in Alleviating Third World Socio-Economic Hardships
  • Supriya Routh (PhD student, University of Victoria), Indian Supreme Court in Development: Constructing ‘Development’ in the ‘Law & Development’ Discourse
  • John L.S. Simpkins (PhD Candidate, University of Melbourne), Courts and Post-Colonial Constitution – Making: Lessons from Uganda and Zambia
  • Atudiwe P. Atupare (PhD candidate, Queens University), A Theory of Rights for Young Democracies in Africa

Sponsored by the Asia Pacific Dispute Resolution Project

PANEL XVI: Refusing Western Legal Universalisms (Room D)


  • Noora Johanna Arajärvi, (Researcher, Tilburg University and European University Institute), Norms Beyond Custom? Opinio Juris and the Extra-Legal Considerations in the Formation of Customary International Law
  • Mukesh Bhatt (Birkbeck College, University of London), Hindu Law, Gujarati Migrants, Western Cultures
  • Muhammad–Basheer A. Ismail (PhD Candidate, University of Hull), Islamic International Diplomatic Law: Any Relevance Within the Contemporary International Legal Order?
  • Shiva Olyaei (PhD Candidate, University of British Columbia), Secular CEDAW or Islamic Shari’a: A Critical Analysis of the Role of Law in Women’s Right’s Dynamism

Sponsored by the Graduate Program in Law at Osgoode Hall Law School

7:00 DINNER – Adega Restaurant – 33 Elm Street

We will convene in Reception Room E after the panels have concluded and walk over to the restaurant together.